Knowledge is Power - The Uncensored Free Speech Forum

This is a forum where everything can be discussed. As freedom is censored out of existence, this is a place where nothing is censored. This forum is your very own Total Free Speech Zone. Please enjoy and contribute as you will.
 
It is currently Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:31 pm

All times are UTC



Welcome
Welcome to newsfromatlantis

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to communicate privately with other members (PM) and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
About the war on France, I remember a suspicious thing I have read some times ago. When German armies broke through the French lines, everything wasn't lost for the French army. Two armies which were located behind the front line were coming to stop the Germans. But what is very strange and suspicious, is that allegedly because of organizational problems, those two armies were almost completely lost during their journey toward the German armies. Equipment were sent somewhere, soldiers elsewhere. Some soldier were sent by train, many others afoot. Finally, they almost disappeared in the air.

Quite incredible. But not so incredible if everything was stagged by Jewish leaders in order to make France and England lose this battle. These armies were lost on purpose.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
SerbdomFighter wrote:
Hexzane, I found this information about Hitler's and Stalin's blunders, claiming that Stalin refused retreat:

Quote:
Both Hitler and Stalin refused to allow retreats, as a matter of principle and regardless of the military situation. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers in each side died in vain because they were not allowed to retreat when was necessary. Russia almost lost the war because of that in 1941, and Hitler's army suffered horrible losses because of that, mainly in the winter of 1942 and in Stalingrad a year later.

http://www.2worldwar2.com/mistakes.htm#hitler-stalin


I knew that for Hitler. I didn't knew that for Stalin. I remember to have learned that they used the same retreat strategy than Russian army against Napoleon. However, it's true that hundreds of thousands of soviet soldiers were lost during the first months of Operation Barbarossa. So maybe the official explanation is that. I will try to have more information about this.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
SerbdomFighter wrote:
How can Japan be controlled by Jews? Jews can't play Asians, somebody (a member of this forum) told me that Mao was a (half-)Jew. It's possible that there are Japanese Masons, but the Japanese were always aggressive in wars, they were even brutal to each other (civil wars between several Japanese kingdoms). While Japan attacked China and other countries, Soviet Union wasn't touched. During the Russian-Japanese war (1905) the Jewish bankers (especially Jacob Schiff) financed the Japanese for the struggle against Russia. Most strange thing is that Hitler still declared war on USA after the Pearl Harbor attack. I think that Hitler ordered the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor and to invade other Asiatic countries because of the stationed British troops there. I read somewhere that Japan didn't attack Soviet Union because they feared a two-front war. Very strange, they PROVOKED already a two-front war. I think that Hitler ordered the Japanese to do these blunders.


I also thought that about Japan. But there are too many and too big discrepancies from them. It can mean only one thing. They were infiltrated too.

Jews are able to play Asians through race mixing. I had read a long time ago in an official French newspaper that during the 1930's, 30.000 jews migrated to China. So, they were certainly able to go to Japan and to marry Japanese girls. And after two or three generations, they would have been similar enough to Asians to be considered as such. Then with their capacity to infiltrate circles of power, it would have been easy as pie for them to get the power. And of course, they certainly introduced Masonry into Japan. So, not only were they able to infiltrate the power by themselves, but also by their Mason puppets.

I think that they didn't do that before the 18th or 19th century. Before that, Japan was most probably ruled by Gentiles. But during the 20th century, it's obvious that Japan was infiltrated.

This is why I think their strange behavior during WWII didn't come from obedience to Hitler, or from being financed by Jewish money. Attacking the USA was so absurd that even Hitler wouldn't have been able to push Japan to do it. No, the government of Japan was already under control. So, they didn't need advices or orders, or money anymore. They followed the plan from Jewish leaders simply because they were jews and Masons. Stories of money can eventually be true. But it's a smokescreen for the real reason of the actions of those leaders. The real reason being they were jews and Masons.

Jews have been in China since a long time. They were called Zhu-hu, or Zhu-hu-du (it's in Wikipedia). So, adaptations of this name like Tzu, Zhou, Tchou, Ze, Tse, are probably used by jews. This means that famous people with that kinds of name are very probably jews. So, Mao was very probably a jew. His complete name was Mao Zedong or Mao Tse-Tung. Mao could also be an adaptation of Gao, which is also a jewish name in China (adaptation of Cohen). And his prime minister Zhou Enlai or Chou En-Lai, was most probably a jew also. Li (and thus Lai) being also a jewish name in China (an adaptation of Levy. The levy's being the most powerful families, with the Cohen, in the jewish world). So, most probably were they jews.

About the ability from jews to be considered as Asians, I remember having seen two or three year ago a Chinese music producer at the TV. He was loosing his hairs precociously, like jews. He had a jewish nose. And the look of his face, while very Asian, had a kind of jewish look. He didn't totally look like other Asian. Since he was a music producer (a profession hold by jews in western countries), he was very probably a jew. But he was considered as an Asian. And probably that nobody in China suspected the he was a jew.

PS : and to go beyond WWII, we can study other famous Asian politicians. Wikipedia tells us that Ai, Shi, Gao, Jin, Li, Zhang, and Zhao are jewish names in China. They are sinofications of the original seven Jewish clan's family names: Ezra, Shimon, Cohen, Gilbert, Levy, Joshua, and Jonathan, respectively.

Thus, Zhao Ziyang, prime minister of China between 1980 and 1987 was also a jew. Li Peng, prime minister of China between 1988 and 1998, was one of them. Deng Xiaoping or Teng Hsiao-Ping, said to be the de facto ruler of China between 1978 and 1992 was a jew also (Hsiao being an adaptation of Zhao). Ho Chí Minh (also named Nguyên Aï Quoc and Nguyen Sinh Cung), prime minister (1945–1955) and president (1945–1969) of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, was probably a jew too.


Last edited by Hexzane on Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
SerbdomFighter wrote:
I think that Poland was the first country to invade because of his "Lebensraum" policy and because of the raw materials from Soviet Union. When Poland was defeated and divided by both countries, the Bolsheviks gave Hitler many raw materials (at least 900.000 tons of oil and many other raw materials), which built up Hitler's economy and army. It was the BOLSHEVIKS (Jews) who helped Hitler to build his army for the war:


The Lebensraum policy justifies only the invasion itself, but not the timing of the events. Same thing for the material help from Soviets. Hitler could have invaded Poland after having invaded France. But, being the aggressor of France, it would have been more difficult to explain why USSR didn't declare war on Germany (even with the pact between Germany and USSR). Whereas with France and England being the aggressors, it was easier.

Anyway, very interesting information about the supply of raw material from USSR to Germany. I didn't know that.


Last edited by Hexzane on Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
But let's talk about operation Barbarossa.

So we have already those incoherences :

7) "The Jew Hitler (against the advice of all his generals) single-handedly saves Moscow by ordering army group "Center" to stop its advance on Moscow".

8) "The Jew Hitler tells the Soviets an attack will occur at Kursk. The Jew Hitler delays the attack for more than four months, until the Soviets have built defensive lines eight deep. The Soviets concentrate 1,300,000 soldiers with 3,600 tanks, 20,000 artillery pieces, including 6,000 76mm anti-tank guns, and 2,400 aircraft in and around Kursk. An attack anywhere other than Kursk would be fatal for the Soviets, but the Soviets seem to know that the attack will come only at Kursk."

They knew it because the war was a fake one, planned by the jewish leaders.

9) "The Jew Hitler orders German troops to attack the most heavily defended lines ever constructed, at Kursk".

"The Jew Hitler is amazed by the supermen of the elite SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte, who, in the south, break through all eight defensive lines and take on the Soviet reserve tank battalions".

"Less than two weeks into the offensive, worried that the Liebstandarte might win the battle for the Germans, the Jew Hitler strips this elite group of their tanks and ships them to Northern Italy, where they sit on their hands for some months before returning to the eastern front. The pretext of the Sicily invasion is used".

As there was enough jews in the concentration camps, Hitler's mission was over, and then, he had to loose the war. And the unexpected success of the SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte was not at all a part of the plan. So, he sent them far away.

And, of course, it was not because he was caring for his troops. In many other occasions, orders were to be killed rather than retreating.

This stupid strategy of being killed rather than retreating was also a part of the jewish plan. With an elastic defense, the war could have last two or three more years. But jewish leaders didn't need the war anymore. So, Hitler had to choose a stupid strategy which would accelerate the end of the war.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
SerbdomFighter wrote:
Battle of Kursk is also a bit unknown, according to Wikipedia, the Soviet intelligence found out that the Nazis planned an attack at Kursk. The author claimed that Hitler TOLD the Soviets about this attack. I would like know where did he find this information.


In my opinion, the guy said this in a figurative sense. I think he meant that the Koursk attack was so obvious that it was as if Hitler had told Stalin that he would attack there.

On the French Wikipedia page about Kursk, you find this :

"It appeared quickly, with the aerial scoutings, that the Soviet General staff had anticipated this attack and considerably reinforced his defenses. The attack was transforming into an assault against fortified positions. The state of invasion forces didn't allow the success of such an operation and it was decided to postpone it's beginning to reinforce units. First planned for the 1st of May, it was postpone until the 12t, and then finally until the 4th of July, in order to get more weapons come from Germany, especially the new Tiger and Panther16 tanks.

... To the contrary of previous offensives, the surprise effect, even at the tactical level, is nor searched anymore, which contradicts the basis of Blitzkrieg, Stavka knowing the place of the assault and preparing to it. Zitadel operation, planned by the OKW, was the antithesis of this concept. The attack point was very easily predictable for every person in possession of a map, and was reflecting a thought coming from WWI.
"

So, it confirms clearly this. The attack was so obvious that it was as if Hitler had told them that he would attack there with the biggest part of his forces.

Such a behavior is clearly sabotage.

They also talk about the for months of delay of the attack :

"During the for months of delay given by the lateness of Germans, the Red army installed more than 400.000 mines, and dug nearly 5.000 km of trenches, with position sometimes distant of 175 km. Accent emphasis is put on antitank fight, with the creation at every levels of decision of units specialized into this task..."

So, we have a confirmation there that it was indeed 4 months of delay.

And when the guy says that if Hitler had attacked anywhere else, he would have won the war, it's very probably true. Hitler should have planned another attack elsewhere. If he didn't do that, it's because he was in fact a traitor, a Jewish sayanim.

There is also the fact that Stalin seemed to know that Hitler would attack only there. Otherwise, Stalin wouldn't have concentrated the biggest part of his forces there. As said by the guy, if Hitler had attacked anywhere else, it would have been a catastrophe for the Soviet army. The fact that Stalin seemed to know that Hitler would attack there and only there, shows us that the battle was completely staged, and that the winner was known till the beginning.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
When you think about it, the very fact of suddenly attacking cities instead of continuing the attacks in the countryside is abnormal. Why not by-passing cities ? They just had to avoid a counter attack and then, attack elsewhere, in places where the Soviet army was weak. It was the principle of the Blitzkrieg. With all the space there was on the Russian territory, it was a paradise for surprise attacks, for a war of movement. And Germans were the best at this game (well..., they were supposed to). And they had the aerial superiority at this moment. After that, the cities would have fallen without fighting.

When they attacked France, Germans didn't do that (giant attacks of cities). They attacked in the countryside. This change in their strategy is another clue about Hitler's treason.

But being a Jewish traitor, Hitler had to do this. Otherwise, German army would have won easily. With this change of strategy, Hitler could let Soviet armies know he would attack at point X, and then reinforce their defenses.

In fact, Germans didn't use such a strategy at the beginning of the war against USSR. They used then the blitzkrieg strategy. So, it's even clearer there. When they needed to win quickly according to the Jewish leaders plan, Germans used the blitzkrieg. And when they needed to loose, they began suddenly to make stupid attacks against cities.

If they had used the blitzkrieg strategy on France or Poland alone, but never during the war against Soviets, maybe official historians could have given (phony) arguments sustaining such a strategy. But as they have used the blitzkrieg against Russians at the beginning, it becomes harder to find reasons explaining why they didn't use it anymore.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
About the fact that Stalin was on the point of attacking Germany when the Hitler attacked USSR, here is another argument.

This is on the French Wikipedia page about operation Barbarossa :

"Ground attack is preceded by the biggest aerial attack of all times, with the main part of the 2770 airplanes being engaged in support of this front. This attack begins without a declaration of war, at 3h30, and aims at 66 Soviet airports. It had disastrous results on the Soviet army, since it gives to the Luftwaffe the absolute control of the Soviet sky during several weeks. German bombers find Soviet airplanes aligned close together, usually without camouflage or protection. Most of the time, the alert wasn't even raised and few airplanes are able to take off. The VVS's losses are terrible : attacked on 66 airports, at 12 PM, they have lost 1200 airplanes, of which 800 on the ground. The night, 1489 airplanes have been destroyed on the ground and 389 in the air."

Without the aerial superiority, the quick victory of Hitler during the two first months of the attack would have been more difficult to explain. And even if all was stagged, it could have thwarted the plan of Jewish leaders.

Anyway, it shows us once again that this story of Stalin being on the verge of attacking Germany is bullshit.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
I have found informations about the SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte. At Kursk, it was part of 2e SS-Panzerkorps, of SS-Obergruppenführer Paul Hausser (itself being part of the 4th panzer army of Generaloberst Hoth).

On this site, ( http://secondeguerremondiale.centerblog ... olf-Hitler ) we have this :

"Launching his attacks the 5th of July, the Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler progresses well at the beginning, reaching the second defense line at the end of the first day...

.... The 11th of July, the division reaches the Psel river, the last main obstacle before Kursk itself."

We have a map here ( http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3nF13nBudU4/T ... _euros.jpg ) about the lines of defense of the Soviet Army. Maybe there was a total of 7 or 8 defense lines. But for the immediate operation about Kursk, it seems that there was only three to cross. And the 12th of July, only 7 days after the beginning of the battle, the German army had crossed the third one. So, as the guy said, the 4th army had crossed all the defensive lines of the Soviet army (except that it was not 8 but 3). July the 12, Germans were at Prokhorovka, so behind the third defense line. Soviets launched a counter attack with an army located behind the front line. But it wasn't well organized. And they lost a lot of tanks.

So, if the German army had received reinforcements, they would have most probably won the battle, as the guy said. With some reinforcements, there was nearly nothing able to stop them to join the German forces on the north.

But Hitler came the 13th of July, and although Von Manstein begged him to give him reinforcements, Hitler refused. He decided to even stop the entire attack and to pass in defensive mode. The reason why he did that was that there was elsewhere two counter-attacks from Soviets (Kutuzov operation at the north and Polkovodets Roumiantsev operation at the south), and that Sicily had been invaded. So, it was not only the SS Panzer Korps Liebstandarte which was sent elsewhere, but it was the entire attack itself which was stopped whereas it was on the point of being won.


Last edited by Hexzane on Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hitler the jew and the faked world war II
Unread postPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 54
About the fact that Hitler didn't mobilized all German population for the war, if it's true, it's maybe to justify deportations. The reason presented would then be that he wanted to preserve Germans. Thus, it would give another (official) explanation for the deportation of jews.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Donate Now
Donate Now



Hosted by © 2017 FreeForums.org | Create a free forum | Powered by phpBB
About FreeForums | Legal | Advertise Here | Investors | Contact FreeForums.org

Template made by DEVPPL Flash Games
 
suspicion-preferred